Analysis of the Opinion of Judge William R. Overton
Title: Analysis of the Opinion of Judge William R. Overton
Category: /Social Sciences/Philosophy
Details: Words: 583 | Pages: 2 (approximately 235 words/page)
Analysis of the Opinion of Judge William R. Overton
Category: /Social Sciences/Philosophy
Details: Words: 583 | Pages: 2 (approximately 235 words/page)
Judge William R. Overton sets out five criteria in examining the validity of 'creation science' as a scientific theory in the case McLean vs. Arkansas. Two of these characteristics are testability against the empirical world and the tentativeness of a theory's conclusion. Overton explains why he thinks these criteria are important and why creation science fails to satisfy them.
Overton feels that testability against the empirical world is a fundamental tenet of modern science. According
showed first 75 words of 583 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 583 total
flight would never be possible. In science there is no absolute. least of all the concept that certain scientific theories can never be tested against the empirical world. This also leads to one of the other criteria that Overton uses to judge creation science, the tenativeness of a theory's conclusions.
Tentativity is considered to be a natural aspect of a scientific theory. To date there has not been one scientific theory which has been absolute.